J
jyr
Hello you all,
Some of you may have seen my previous post on collapsible 50 mm.
I currently use an M with a rigid summicron but would like to purchase a collapsible 50 Elmar. I still hesitate between a modern M-2.8 and an 'old' E39-3.5, that some of you have considered (even) sharper and that is obviously much more compact (that is the quality required for a collapsible lens).
Would you like to further comment on the compared qualities of these two lenses? Is the 'red scale' 3.5 improved compared to the older version?
Additionally, I could get a LTM body as second camera. Not for collection but of course for shooting! Therefore I only would consider a camera the shutter of which should be as reliable as that of my M6. But I could do without rangefinder. Therefore, an IC could be a good match. Would anyone comment on this choice? Has the IC from the 50's the improved shutter of the IIIG? What price could be reasonable? How much is a CLA? Thanks in advance,
JY
Some of you may have seen my previous post on collapsible 50 mm.
I currently use an M with a rigid summicron but would like to purchase a collapsible 50 Elmar. I still hesitate between a modern M-2.8 and an 'old' E39-3.5, that some of you have considered (even) sharper and that is obviously much more compact (that is the quality required for a collapsible lens).
Would you like to further comment on the compared qualities of these two lenses? Is the 'red scale' 3.5 improved compared to the older version?
Additionally, I could get a LTM body as second camera. Not for collection but of course for shooting! Therefore I only would consider a camera the shutter of which should be as reliable as that of my M6. But I could do without rangefinder. Therefore, an IC could be a good match. Would anyone comment on this choice? Has the IC from the 50's the improved shutter of the IIIG? What price could be reasonable? How much is a CLA? Thanks in advance,
JY