50mm F2 summicron
Agree with the monitors and graphics cards variations, I disagree that file size makes no difference at all?! The scan results from my nikon scanner are not perfect but are superb for the price! and even after basic resizing and very little unsharp mask! It still looks much better all round not just the tonal range, than the one shown here once uploaded... Having said that I'm in no way unhappy or having a dig at anyone here or the forum rules Thanx for the various comments without which, wou
an often neglected speciality in this forum is the fact that pictures succeeding a size of 600 pixel get jpeg-recompressed while uploading. The picture first seen is the twice compressed and that causes a remarkable loss in quality. If you click on the image the bigger-sized gets loaded, this look better then. As I see above this picture is one of them. Looking carefully at it I find jpeg artefacts in the sky (not to talk about unparallelity but thats something else of course).
You can i
apologies for being late with comment & rating... where was this shot? looks like one of those cool bridges near docklands...
thanx for the nice rating yooloo! It's the millennium bridge in Newcastle, England. here is another pic I took of it from a different perspective... http://www.contaxg.com/document.php?id=13991
thanks, zeus, nice pic btw.
i guess londoners got the mini version of it...
Here's a link to this photo. Just copy and paste!
Here is direct link of this photo
Copy and paste the code below (HTML):
Copy and paste the code below (BBCode):
[URL=https://www.camera-info.com/gallery/photos/1974/]1974[/URL] by [URL=https://www.camera-info.com/gallery/authors/zeus.0/]Zeus[/URL] on CI Photocommunity