1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
M6 35mm. Width orginal, but cropped height wise.
Click on the photo to start tagging. Done Tagging

In This Album

1581 561 651 1641 1491 1671 711 1821 1761 1851 1881 2001 2871 2121 2811 2211
reagan
M6 35mm. Width orginal, but cropped height wise.
In the album People Photography
  1. View previous comments... 5 of 25
  2. reagan
    reagan
    yes, here, just letting others throw around a little bit of steam...thank you for the first comment for some time relating to the photograph, rather than a personal battle...

    And Swann, you comment dated thursday 18th at 10.50pm is out of order...Critisim is not a problem but that?
  3. Swann
    Swann
    @reagan
    The comment you refer to was adressed to mbru65's remark about the sexy qualities of this image.
    Sorry I did not understand the rest of your comment: "..Critisim is not a problem but that?" maybe you like to explain?
  4. reagan
    reagan
    'Looks like if she was doing a gynaecological self examination' I find that a particularly distasteful thing to say...even if it was addressed to mbru65...
  5. Swann
    Swann
    @reagan
    Thank you for explaining.
    You see, mbru65 was teasing me in another thread, therefore I came back to this photograph though I had almost forgotten it.
    To your picture: As I already said it has its qualities, specially in lighting and composition. Very traditional but well crafted anyway.
    You have certainly realized that I am not happy with the exposition of female nudity. I am irritated by the idea of an (invisible) male staring through the little hole of an optical machine to naked
  6. yvan m3
    yvan m3
    I don'nt enter in the debate ( too difficult in english) ! I want to say that with my man's eyes, mind and phantasm this picture brings me emotions may be because it's a nice women sitting in this armchair! So thanks "reagan"!

Share This Page